News

Schiff Writes Letter to Metro Board Members Opposing 710 Tunnel Alternative After EIR Released

Rep. Adam Schiff. – Photo by Terry Miller

Rep. Adam Schiff. – Photo by Terry Miller

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Burbank) sent a letter to Chairman Eric Garcetti and members of the Los Angeles Metro Board opposing the SR-710 North freeway tunnel alternative proposed in the SR-710 North Study by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). In the letter, Schiff pushes the Board and Metro to instead study a more innovative, multimodal approach, combining mass transit, bikeways, new parks to improve air quality and more efficient ways of moving cargo.

The full letter that Schiff sent it below:

“Dear Chairman Garcetti and Metro Board Members:

“I write to express my opposition to the SR 710 North freeway tunnel alternative proposed in the SR-710 North Study by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro). After review of the draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS), it is my belief that a tunnel would be cost prohibitive and detrimental to the communities overall, including many cities that I represent in Congress.

“When the idea of a tunnel was first raised and it was believed that the rare common ground in the decades-long fight over the 710 might be underground, I was willing to explore its fiscal, technical and community feasibility. At the time, Metro represented that due to improvements in tunneling technology, a below ground option might cost the same or only fractionally more than the discredited at-grade proposal – or roughly $1.5 billion.

“This estimate would prove wildly optimistic. Whatever the technological feasibility, a single-bore or dual-bore tunnel is cost prohibitive and could cost anywhere between $3.15 billion and a whopping $5.65 billion. All of the four other alternative proposals put together would cost less than even the more modest tunnel option. Furthermore, experience on other major transportation projects teaches us that even these costs are likely to be considerably higher than the estimates produced in an EIR/EIS report.

“It was also believed by Metro at the time a tunnel was first proposed that the agency would be able to garner strong community support for the idea. This has also proved not to be the case. To the degree a consensus has formed around the tunnel – at least insofar as the communities along its path are concerned – it is a consensus against the proposal, finding it too costly, too disruptive and too backward a solution to transportation needs in the 21st Century. Our communities want new and innovative ways to move people and improve air quality, not more freeways above or below ground with their smokestacks for ventilation and even more vehicles belching exhaust through their neighborhoods.

“I was discouraged to see that the draft EIR/EIS did not seriously consider a more innovative, multimodal approach, combining mass transit, bikeways, new parks to improve air quality and more efficient ways of moving cargo. These are the approaches favored by so many constituents who have written in to the Board. Many urban areas in the United States, including Los Angeles, are starting to take an ‘all of the above’ approach to addressing their transportation needs using bus, light rail, and other forms of transportation to address their commuting needs. While I believe the bus rapid transit and light rail transit approaches are good starting points, I encourage Metro and Caltrans to continue seeking community input to further explore a multimodal approach that combines the best of these options and makes our communities more interconnected, not divided.

“Metro could help reshape the transportation future of Los Angeles by thinking outside the box to get people outside their vehicles, by integrating parks and better urban planning, smart traffic lights and smarter mass transit, all of this and more, and all for less than the cost of a tunnel.

“At the beginning of this process, many in the community were afraid that Metro would plow ahead with a predetermined conclusion – that the freeway must be finished, that it must proceed along its historic route, above or below ground it did not matter – and other ideas would only be entertained so that they might be rejected in a process with only the appearance of deliberation. As the challenges facing Los Angeles are new, I urge Metro to think anew, reject the tunnel, and give serious consideration to other, more forward thinking and more suitable options.”

 

May 6, 2015

About Author

Pasadena Independent Our team focuses on delivering you the most informative and interesting articles from a variety of sections to keep you well-equipped with everyday knowledge!


2 COMMENTS ON THIS POST To “Schiff Writes Letter to Metro Board Members Opposing 710 Tunnel Alternative After EIR Released”

  1. Jan Dils says:

    Those of us who live on Orange Grove are terrified. We will be spending a good deal of money as necessary to avoid this crazy scheme by MTA. It is particularly devastating for Pasadena–know and loved for the Rose Parade on New Years Day. Millions of people travel here and millions watch the game. This outrageous idea of two tunnels, the resulting traffic jams, the poorer air quality, and years of building and tearing apart one of the most beautiful areas of Southern California…. The last idea MTA had for making a connector of some sort meant that many families were required to sell their homes to MTA. For whatever reason, this never worked either. Those homes were not maintained well according to the press coverage of that last idea. They were rented to people who complained about the lack of maintenance verified by the press–roofs leaking, dead or dying lawns. A street which was once attractive has been crumbling for decades–for no reason–at a high cost to taxpayers. It is a scandal! Someone must be making money on this.

    Surely, MTA should have learned a lesson here. You want to dig up the Tournament of Roses house?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join the Community
Fields marked with a * are required.
Follow Us On Instagram